The Right Prescription for West Virginia

Reducing the Supply of Painkillers to Ease the Drug Epidemic

The drug problem in West Virginia is complex, with many moving parts and seemingly few concrete solutions.  Enforcement, prevention, and treatment are all important, but one strategy that deserves additional attention is that of supply-side intervention.  This involves taking steps to reduce the number of prescription painkillers actually prescribed and dispensed in our state.  Researchers have found that when the number of pills distributed declines, the reduced supply does not recover, drug abuse decreases, and public health improves.  Supply-side strategies save lives and are worth pursuing with great vigor in West Virginia.

The excessive prescribing of painkillers began in the mid-1990s as a result of aggressive and misleading marketing by certain manufacturers.  It was during this time that the painkiller OxyContin was promoted as being non-addictive despite being virtually identical to heroin.  Doctors were convinced by this idea and began to write scripts for it and a variety of other painkillers without hesitation.  The number of prescriptions for opioids skyrocketed, and today Americans consume 81 percent of the world’s oxycodone and nearly 100 percent of the world’s hydrocodone.  This widespread prescribing has led to thousands of annual overdose deaths, millions of pill abusers, and a demand for heroin that has reached epidemic proportions.  Doctors in West Virginia write with a heavy pen, issuing more painkiller prescriptions per capita than all but two states.

U.S. Attorney Bill Ihlenfeld discussing the drug epidemic with White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Director Michael Botticelli at a June 2015 Prescriber Education Conference designed by our office.

U.S. Attorney Bill Ihlenfeld discussing the drug epidemic with White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Director Michael Botticelli at a June 2015 Prescriber Education Conference designed by our office.



Advertisement


What the pharmaceutical industry did in promoting pain pills was not much different from what the tobacco industry did with cigarettes; it lied about the addictive nature of its product and earned billions by deceiving naive consumers.  “Big Pharma,” much like “Big Tobacco,” left a great deal of damage in its wake, and the costs to clean up the mess are extraordinary.  One of the costs — that of treatment — is one that our state cannot afford.  As a result, many West Virginians who want help for their addiction cannot afford it, cannot find it, or die trying.

There are, however, some actions that if taken will bring us closer to the end of this crisis.  If I could write a prescription for West Virginia, it would look something like this:

  • Conservative prescribing practices. Doctors and hospitals should adopt policies that call for opioids to be prescribed less often, in lower doses, and for shorter durations. In fact, opioids should be a last resort for pain treatment instead of the first line of defense.  These policies should also discourage the prescribing of opioids (i.e. Percocet) together with benzodiazepines (i.e. Xanax) because it’s often a lethal combination.
  • Lower expectations from patients. Many of us have unreasonable expectations about how our pain should be treated.  We have come to expect a 60-day supply of pain pills when something less will often do.  The answer is not always a Percocet, but instead might be physical therapy, acupuncture, exercise, rest, or the use of non-narcotic pain relievers.
The U.S. Attorney has organized a local task force in the effort to spread awareness throughout the Northern District.

The U.S. Attorney has organized a local task force in the effort to spread awareness throughout the Northern District.

  • Increased accountability for deviant distributors. Wholesale distributors, pharmacies, and practitioners continue to engage in unlawful practices that cause excessive amounts of pain pills to be dispensed in West Virginia. The price to pay for this crime should be steep, to include prison time, licensure revocation, and large financial penalties.
  • Use of settlements to fund treatment. When drug companies reach financial settlements with the state or federal government for wrongdoing, a portion of the proceeds should be used to pay for treatment facilities in the affected states.  This might be the only way that a state like ours will ever be able to afford adequate treatment resources.
  • Better use of prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs). Pharmacies should always check the PDMP (some don’t) and every state’s PDMP should be connected (they’re not) to prevent doctor-shopping and the dispensing of contra-indicated medications.

We’ve still got a long way to go, but a comprehensive and proactive supply-side strategy will help us to navigate through this painkiller-fueled storm.  By keeping the pressure on the pharmaceutical industry, modifying the frequency, dose, and duration of narcotic prescriptions, and lessening our expectations as patients, West Virginia will emerge as a healthier and safer place to live and raise a family.

(Photos supplied by the U.S. Attorneys Office, Northern District)



One Response

  1. Rochambeau

    These are all good ideas, but there’s one angle that hasn’t been addressed here, and seldom is anywhere else, either. Many doctors rely to some extent on positive feedback from patients, either on public websites or on hospital-sponsored feedback forms. And many patients, having gone to the trouble of going to see a doctor, expect to receive some sort of “cure” that they couldn’t have gotten at home. Sometimes they’ll demand unwarranted antibiotics, and sometimes unwarranted narcotic painkillers. The unspoken message from the medical industry is that this is an acceptable price to pay for positive patient reviews.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.